Archive for the ‘GCHQ’ tag
An announcement by Philip Brennan concerning the UK Police State and his desire to leave the country while he still has the chance to do so.
Philip Brennan | PhilipBrennan.net | 24 May 2011:
Due to unexpected fortuitous circumstances, I am now able to purchase a small property in Bulgaria with a quarter acre of land. Friends of mine already have property out there, and we are planning a permanent exodus out of the United Kingdom Police State.
We are not leaving because of immigration, like what most of the Main Stream Media would claim. We are leaving because we are sick and tired of living in what was once a great country, but is now a Stasified society where you cannot even go to the store without being picked up and spied upon by numerous CCTV cameras, where Habeas Corpus can be suspended at any time for any reason, and where the police can stop and search without reasonable suspicion that you might, just might, be in the commission of a criminal offence.
“Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges (The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws.)” – Cornelius Tacitus (55-117 A.D.)
What will happen to PhilipBrennan.net I do not know. I could decide to carry on the fight from abroad, or I could decide to run a blog on life on a smallholding in Bulgaria. I have not decided yet. What I will do is add a couple of years hosting prepaid so that this site will still be up for the next three years.
Over the past couple of years I have, hopefully, taught my readership to be suspicious of the Main Stream Media, and to double check all facts rather than just accept that the BBC / ITV are telling the truth on all that they report. Now I have to tell you that you should be equally discerning about what the Alternative News Media reports, because they are just as prone to disinformation as the Main Stream Media.
ALL Media is Propaganda.
What you have to discern is whether it is propaganda for good, or for ill.
Now talking about the BBC, I would like to say that it is the worst state propaganda outfit going, and that you’re all paying to be propagandised to without even realising it, but then, few are familiar with the roots of the BBC. The BBC was formed out of Wellington House at the end of World War One. Wellington House, from 1913 to 1920, was the propaganda wing of the British Empire’s war effort, and published all the propaganda needed to fight the First World War on the home and foreign fronts. Once you understand this, you will realise why there is often a discrepancy between what is reported on the BBC World Service news, and what is reported on the domestic radio and television stations.
Also, you have to remember that both the Tavistock Military Psyops War School and Wellington House were the precursors to the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations (1947 to present), and because all three are a part of the British Secret Intelligence Service (along with MI5, MI6, MI10 and GCHQ), the BBC is embedded within the Secret Intelligence Service, and the Secret intelligence Service are embedded within the BBC.
The so-called independent media are no better.
“The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media.” – William Colby, former Director of the CIA (2004)
“Think of the press as a great keyboard on which the government can play.” – Josef Goebbels, Propaganda Minister of the Third Reich
It is the same in the UK – the Secret Intelligence Service owns everyone of any significance in the UK major media, which is the great keyboard on which the government can play.
I no longer have any time for Alex Jones, David Icke, or any other such “Alternative News Media”, because I have caught them red handed spreading disinformation about the current events in the Maghreb and Arabian Peninsula. Having many contacts on the ground with which I can double check information means that not much gets past me these days.
One of the few activists I implicitly trust, because he has proven himself to be trustworthy, is Brian Gerrish. His web site, the UK Column, is always worth reading, and the forums attached to the site are a great place to gather information, although I would say that you should critically examine everything that is posted on these boards.
I still have a lot of respect for Charlie Veitch, even though he does get some things wrong at times. Being wrong about something and deliberately spreading disinformation are two entirely different things, and the former can always be forgiven. The latter cannot be forgiven.
Over the coming three to four months I will be busy with procuring a small property in Bulgaria, and making plans to move out there. I have seen a lovely cottage in the same village as a friend’s property, but we are still making enquiries to see if it is still up for sale. If it is still on the market I will fly over to Bulgaria to take a very hard look at it, and if I think it is right for me, I will buy it. Otherwise, I will keep looking.
I will keep you posted on this should I have further news.
Philip Brennan. A Free Man on the Land in Lawful Rebellion under Article 61 of the Magna Carta and the 1689 Bill of Rights.
With certain people within my circle of contacts being suckered by Sorcha Faal / EU Times articles, I feel it is time to deal with the whole messy subject of intelligence sources.
Before I go into this subject in any great depth, I would first like to deal with Sorcha Faal, otherwise known as David Booth of the CIA. David Booth works within the Central Intelligence Agency in COINTELPRO. Other western intelligence agencies known for using COINTELPRO methods include MI5, MI6, GCHQ, and the think-tank, DEMOS. To be quite blunt, all intelligence agencies have their own COINTELPRO departments.
Sorcha Faal does not exist. There is no “spokesperson” within the GRU named Sorcha Faal. Intelligence agencies rarely make public statements, and when they do, it is always through either someone in the highest echelons of the organisation or a government minister with the correct clearances, and never a mere “spokesperson”.
Do leaks ever happen through lesser agents? Yes, but those agents if caught are dealt with very strictly, usually with “Holy Orders” to keep their traps shut. By rights, if “Sorcha Faal” was really working within the GRU, she would have been silenced by now. Permanently.
It appears that David Booth is a major thorn in the side of the Alternative Intelligence Community, as well as the Patriot and Truth Movements. This is a gross understatement. Over the past week or two I have had to take aside many people and let them in on the whole Sorcha Faal thing.
Known sites run by Sorcha Faal / David Booth:
Known sites that Sorcha Faal / David Booth writes for:
Further Information on Sorcha Faal / David Booth:
So why does David Booth do what he does? To understand this you have to understand the nature of COINTELPRO, and how it relates to his “work”. In order to do this I am going to have to dissect one of Sorcha Faal’s articles, and show you how it is used in COINTELPRO.
From “Obama Orders Military To Prepare For Spring Food Riots” on WhatDoesItMean.com, dated 13 January 2011:
“…A grim report prepared by France’s General Directorate for External Security (DGSE) obtained by Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) states that president’s Obama and Sarkozy have “agreed in principal” to create a joint US-European military force to deal exclusively with a Global uprising expected this spring as our World runs out of food.
According to this report, Sarkozy, as head of the G-20 group of developed Nations, called for and received an emergency meeting with Obama this past Monday at the White House wherein he warned his American counterpart that the shock rise in food prices occurring due to an unprecedented series of disasters was threatening the stability of the entire World and could lead to the outbreak of Total Global War.
Just last week French Prime Minister Francois Fillon underlined that one of France’s top G-20 priorities was to find a collective response to “excessive volatility” in food prices now occurring, a statement joined by Philippe Chalmin, a top economic adviser to the French government, who warned the World may face social unrest including food riots in April as grain prices increase to unprecedented highs…”
So the “SVR states that…”? Whom within the SVR is making that statement? As I have already said above, on the rare occasions that an intelligence agency makes a public statement, it will either come through a named official in the higher echelons of the intelligence organisation or a government minister with the correct brief and security clearance, and not through a mere, unidentified, “spokesperson”.
Notice how Sorcha Faal only links to the Wikipedia entries to the DGSE and SVR, and not their official sites. Why? Because if you followed links to their actual sites you will find no such public statements from them. In fact, you will not find any public statements from them at all. If I was to write about the Secret Intelligence Service, I would link to their official web site. If you go over there, you will find no public press statements from them at all on their web site. Why? Because they never make any public statements unless it is through their commander in chief or the Secretary of State through the National Press.
You can see an example of this in an article from The Guardian last year, in an article entitled “MI5 warns Britain facing double terrorism threat” dated the 24th September 2010:
“…Today’s announcement by the home secretary, Theresa May, means MI5 believes the threat is at its highest for at least a decade. Security officials are combating this threat, plus what is assessed to be the greater threat from al-Qaida-inspired terrorists, who remain “highly likely” to stage an attack…”
Notice how the statement from MI5 came through official channels, in this case, through our current Home Secretary, Theresa May.
This does not prove that the information is accurate or truthful, but it does prove the source. The intelligence services are known for giving out false information within the national press in order to fulfil a political agenda. So just because the source is officially verified, does not mean that the information is accurate or truthful…
Now going back to the Sorcha Faal article, you will note that she / he does link back to some mainstream news articles concerning the topic in hand, in order to make what he is saying more plausible. Now let us take a good look at what these articles actually say, because I bet most readers will take “Sorcha Faal’s” article at face value without double checking the links.
From “Sarkozy and Obama to discuss soaring food prices” on France24.com (first article link):
“…When French President Nicolas Sarkozy arrives in Washington Monday, he’ll have plenty of ammunition to argue his case for greater global food price and currency stability…”
So far, nothing about crushing food riots in the USA with NATO troops. More like top level discussions on how to stop the speculative commodities markets from pushing up food prices to incendiary levels. Perfectly sensible. In fact, the only discussions on NATO mentioned in that article pertain solely to continuing actions in the Middle East and Africa:
“…The two leaders will also discuss a range of security issues such as the NATO-led war against the Taliban in Afghanistan, Iran’s nuclear developments, the increasing terror threat from Pakistan, and the ongoing post-election crisis in Ivory Coast…”
Where, pray tell, does food riots in America or Europe get a mention here? I cannot see it…
The second and third links go back to the first article, and I see no such dire warning within its text. I do see concerns, but no hint of impending doom. This article certainly does not say what he claims it says, but then, who actually bothers to double check the linked sources on what they read?
As for the fourth link, from Bloomberg Business Week, it primarily talks about food riots in poorer nations of the third world, and not the west. Are those food riots going to be severe and see loss of life? Probably. But it is no “national security” concern of the United States. So where does Sorcha Faal get the idea that both Obama and Sarkozy are going to be talking about Martial Law in the USA due to food riots? From an unquoted source in the SVR. Duh.
In other words, this is a disinformation piece to set up a future straw man argument for if we do get good intelligence about future food shortages in the west and possible food riots. Let me give a scenario:
A couple of months down the line we get good intelligence about food shortages in the west and start blogging about what information we have been getting. Then another disinformation agent who is aware of the Sorcha Faal article will come on the message boards posting straw man arguments like:
“…Where did you get that crap from? Sorcha Faal? Har Har… Sorcha Faal is a nut – she’s talking out of her arse – ergo, you’re a nut who is talking out of your arse…”
This is what Sorcha Faal / David Booth does – he sets up straw man articles in order to discredit any real information we do get. Does not matter if all our sources that we actually do glean our intelligence from are sound. the Sorcha Faal Straw Man Article exists, and will be used by COINTELPRO to discredit whatever real intelligence we get.
Of course, we all know about how the United States military have been training with foreign troops for a Martial Law situation in the United States, and we know about all the Executive Orders and Acts of Congress which allows them to do that, but what we do not know is how or when such an event could be sparked off.
So be aware of Sorcha Faal / David Booth and his agenda, and steer clear from him at all costs.
Philip Brennan | PhilipBrennan.net | 14 January 2011: