Archive for the ‘Kenya’ tag
No conspiracy theory here only facts!
There is a very sick and twisted equation that makes many who have the facts wonder just who and how this perpetual war of terror through-out the world continues to victimize the innocent. With the seemingly unprovoked attacks by jihadists and terrorist organizations, we need to ask some questions. The horrid and senseless acts that are suddenly unleashed without warning just about anywhere in the world now being unfolded within the borders of nations that don’t seem to have any dog in any fight are questionable at best. When we are getting news media coverage of contrary actions that are very disturbing to say the least, one must wonder why there is no clear definition of hero and antagonist.
What happened to the righteousness of America?
Isn’t America supposed to be in the role of liberator, guardian of freedom, and keeper of the peace? Well, that’s what we’ve been told, right? I mean, didn’t we learn this in school through our historical studies that portrayed this nation in the role of a humanitarian power who extended the virtues of its own Constitutional principles for the good of others? Haven’t all of our foreign policy intentions been for noble purposes? Are we not trying to build the framework of personal freedom among the sinister third world nations of the Middle East so that we can help the victims of these fascist cultures to rise above their oppression, hardship, and ignorance? At least, that’s what we have been told, right?
I would like to pose some rather troubling questions that are going to lead us to examine what our true role in all these questions really is. I am going to point out the actions of our federal government that are neither noble or in the interests of promoting peace. These inconvenient truths should make any American with a brain wonder just what is going on in this supposedly perpetual war on terrorism and the origin of the problem. You may find these facts not only distressing, but you will probably ask just why these things are allowed to happen when the true agenda points to anything but America having a justifiable role in the supposed war against terror.
What are US terrorists doing in Kenya?
Reportedly 10 American citizens took part in the bloody terrorist attack on the Westgate Mall in Nairobi, Kenya. Were these truly American citizens, naturalized citizens immigrated from elsewhere, or were they actually recruited as combatants for the cause of terrorism? Indications are that these terrorists who killed more than a hundred shoppers in the mall were indeed enlisted by terrorist recruiters. Americans that willingly participated in the killing of innocent civilians whose only mistake was being in the wrong place at the wrong time! Why?
Look what’s happening on our soil!
There are currently 35 known terrorist training camps that are operating within the US! Did you know this? Yes, there are 35 terrorist training facilities that are under private ownership. These operations are giving military instruction as the trainees wear jihadist, Middle Eastern style, uniforms used to conceal their identities so that they can easily blend back into the local population after committing their cowardly acts of violence. These facilities strenuously instruct their students in the regimen of hatred and commando style assaults, but not in an effort to combat war, these deadly training camps are showing their followers how to commit acts against unarmed citizens in an urban environment unlike armies who fight the soldiers of aggressors with clearly defined objectives. These terrorist training camps located through-out America may very well be preparing for attacks on US citizens here or abroad. The question persists. Why is our government allowing these purveyors of the slaughter of the innocent to be instructed while here on US soil? Seems odd to me!
Why does our government fund terrorism?
If the US is invested in preventing and even pre-empting the hostile acts of terrorists why was Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens acting as a regional arms dealer supplying arms, missiles, and perhaps much more to the rebels that have been in a Syrian civil war for more than a year now as more than 100,000 citizens die in the fighting? Why was the US supplying rebel backed attacks upon a foreign nation? Is this not a violation of both our Constitution as well as a foreign entanglement that we should not be engaging in especially when it supports human rights violations? Is it any wonder that Ambassador Stevens was attacked, captured, raped, murdered, and paraded around the streets of Benghazi, a city that the US State Department awarded security contracts in Libya for our embassy buildings as well as border protection to Al Qaeda? You might recall that this is the very terrorist organization who claimed responsibility for the 9-11 disaster in 2001? Now they’re our allies?
Troubling foreign policy
In that very country of Syria where President Obama has pledged that he will invade in order to stop the use of nerve gas on people, it appears that the very rebels that have been supported by the CIA and US State Department have been caught deploying sarin nerve gas! Why are we aiding these types of organizations? It seems we are not acting in the interests of human rights at all, or we would have done something long before the death toll of 100,000 Syrian citizens had occurred. How about the slaughter of Christians that has been happening in Syria and has even been reported at the hands of the very rebels once again that we support? Is something wrong with this picture?
British complicity as well
What were 2 British soldiers doing dressed as terrorists wearing beards and civilian dress driving around Iraq in a typical car loaded with bombs and ammo as they shot 2 Iraqi police killing one, and proceeded to drive around throwing grenades out the window while stirring up more violence? Why when they were apprehended by Iraqi police did the British army demand their release once Iraqi authorities informed the British Army of their capture? This act of false flag terrorism by our closest allied in the world, the Brits, who then took a convoy of tanks over to the Iraqi police station that held the two English soldiers, and forced their release is also supposed to be fighting the good fight against an irrational and obsessed Middle Eastern coalition of terrorist organizations, yet who was dressed as the enemy shooting at their allies? What is going on?
Why have massive attacks such as 9-11 in New York City as well as the terrorist bombings in London and Barcelona all curiously coordinated simultaneously with anti-terrorist exercises that were being conducted in close proximity? Are all of these events completely coincidental or were they intentionally orchestrated to make it seem that authorities were actually confused in trying to identify hostile elements from training assets deployed in close proximity to the acts being committed? Does this just seem odd when such operations, both friendly and hostile, occur concurrently on not just one occasion but on several occasions?
Why refuse to protect the border?
With unidentified military ground movements having been observed infiltrating our border between Mexico and the states of California, Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas not to mention the deaths of US ranchers, border agents, and citizens, what has our federal government done. Well, AG Eric Holder and his DOJ have waged a legal war against all state governments trying to uphold federal law in absence of the federal government doing its job. As child molesters, drug dealers, convicted criminals, and terrorists of foreign nations violate our borders, the federal government tries to accuse sheriff’s departments of illegally profiling suspects. Now hard working law enforcers must not only worry about being shot by illegal alien criminals, they must also worry about being harassed by the federal government!
Whose side are they on anyway?
Much as in Libya where weapons were trafficked by federal agents into a foreign country, the Fast and Furious program got two US border patrol agents killed, was proven to be extremely ineffective, and even put viable weapons in the hands for foreign criminals who used them when they illegally entered the US via border infiltration. In exchange for the border violations, disrespect for the flag of the US by illegal immigrants already inside our borders, and the killing of innocent citizens along with US law enforcement personnel, our federal government pursues amnesty for millions of Mexicans here or about to enter our country without background checks. They will also be qualified to receive US federal aid in dollars and education. This is our own government’s response to crimes committed by those illegally entering our borders.
An objective evaluation
Let me sum this up for you. As our government aids and abets hostile terrorist organizations attacking other nations such as Syria, Iraq, Libya, and even here in America, whistle blowers are threatened, the truth is hidden by the US media, the CIA and state department silences the survivors of the Benghazi attacks against public testimony, and Congressional investigations do not indict the criminals. Yet, we have something even more ironic to consider. The federal government considers you and I to be more of a threat as the NSA listens in on phone conversations, tracks our bank transactions, probes emails, sets up false search engine pages such as Google and records who searched for what, while NSA employees spy on their wives and girlfriends using tax payer’s dollars to do so. While they fuel terrorism, amnesty, and the unavenged death of Americans abroad FEMA has its instructors telling their employees that our founding fathers were terrorists, the men who fought for our independence from Great Britain are being vilified by our federal government!
Who is really in control?
While our federal government engages in acts of international terrorism, supplies weapons to our enemies, and forms alliances with the same terrorists who have attacked us, American citizens are the suspects. We must be watched on every street corner at every intersection with smart street lamps that record conversations and take photos, from above by UAV’s that can even deliver missiles, our phones are monitored, and our emails are invaded. Yet, we must ask just who is our real government as we struggle with these distractions, these irritations, these insults to our intelligence, even the threat of false flag attacks? Who is influencing our federal government to violate its own laws and to hold its own people in contempt as it supports foreign interests?
It is time
I submit to you that your own federal government is so deeply infiltrated by those who despise the American way of life and hate allowing the people to exercise their freedom that they will stop at nothing to intimidate, to misinform, and to even kill if necessary in order to uphold their agenda. That agenda is to end the American way of life, to curtail all freedoms, and to get us to knuckle under to a fascist global government that has no respect or regard for liberty, justice, or anyone who advocates such obstructing concepts. Remember, that your President Obama admits that he considers the US Constitution to be an obstruction to what he wants to do! That should tell you something. It is time to wake up from the shroud of propaganda that has been cast over you your entire life by the news media, by the federal government, and by an educational system that was designed to indoctrinate you, and start asking questions. You must begin to confront your government officials with grievances and serious probes into the problematic foreign policies of our agencies abroad who reflect a corruption that runs alarmingly deep!
– by Pamela Geller
Check out my latest article over at WND.
An illegitimate child, an illegitimate president Pamela Geller, WND
Talk about your proverbial can of worms. It is now clear that Barack Hussein Obama Sr.'s immigration file was the impetus for President Obama to release his "long form" last week. If he thought that release would put the matter to rest, it has had the opposite effect. It has all raised more questions than it answered, as does the release of shocking revelations in his father's immigration file.
The release of Barack Hussein Obama I's immigration file is stunning in what it reveals and the questions it poses. BHO I's visa expired Aug. 8, 1961 (Barack Junior was born Aug. 4, 1961) – is that why he married Obama's mother? Stanley Ann Dunham was a white girl in a family way with a mixed-race child, desperate for legitimacy in a culture that condemned such behavior as abject immorality, and Barack Obama Sr. was a con man from Kenya desperate to stay in the USA. Was the marriage merely a business arrangement (she was 17 when she got pregnant)? Is that why it was so important to place the ads in the Hawaiian papers announcing the birth of the future president – because his father was about to be deported?
Stanley Ann Dunham could not have been so savvy as to know that BHO I was a Muslim polygamist. Yet clearly, Barack Hussein Obama Sr., was never divorced from his first wife in Kenya. The Immigration and Naturalization Service suspected that the elder Obama's marriage to Dunham was a sham, arranged strictly to secure immigration status for him. Despite the fact that BHO I had married Dunham, the government wasn't buying it: An INS official wrote in 1961 that the agency should "make sure an investigation is conducted as to the bona-fide of the marriage."
And it bears mentioning that BHO I did not marry a different high-school minor whom he impregnated, according to these documents; most probably she went to London for an abortion. But he married Stanley Ann Dunham – why? Immigration status. Obama Sr. was a Kenyan citizen. Kenya was still under English law at this time. But if Barack Sr. was a Muslim polygamist, his "marriage" to Stanley Ann Dunham was invalid.
An INS investigator wrote on June 8, 1964: "They (Harvard officials) weren't very impressed with him and asked us to hold up action on his application until they decided what action they could take in order to get rid of him. They were apparently having difficulty with his financial arrangements and couldn't seem to figure out how many wives he had."
It is interesting to note that BHO I claims in the documents to have divorced first wife, Kezia, "verbally." According to the Shariah, a man can divorce his wife by repeating it three times. Further, when BHO I returned to Kenya, he apparently lived with his first Kenyan wife and his American third wife, suggesting that the "divorce" he ostensibly secured to marry Dunham was a transitory ruse.
That would make the president illegitimate. In 1787, illegitimate children had different rights. There is no way the founders of this great nation intended for an illegitimate child of a foreign bigamist to attain the highest, most powerful position in the new land.
All this means that President Barack Hussein Obama is not natural born. His father was not a U.S. citizen; he is, by that very fact, disqualified to serve as president of the United States. Those who believe that the "natural born" requirement is no longer relevant in our modern age are wrong. The Founding Fathers added this to the requirements for someone serving as president to make it difficult for a spy or traitor to attain the highest office in the land. Clearly, from Obama's performance, this is a considerable cause for concern.
For years, the media and the left have excoriated anyone who questioned the circumstances and events surrounding the birth of the president of the United States. The lack of transparency and honesty only gave rise to more suspicion. And rightly so. One doesn't hand over the reins of power to just anyone, particularly those with an unknown or sketchy past. The dearth of documentation and paperwork led to more speculation. The American people were like Helen Keller, and the Obama machine kept moving the furniture. Who is this man, and what is he hiding?
The birth-certificate issue became the rallying cry
Read the whole thing here.
by Alfred Lambremont Webre
In an exclusive April 29, 2011 interview on ExopoliticsTV with Alfred Lambremont Webre, Robert Stanley, weekly correspondent for the Washington Times investigative radio, states that the purported birth certificate released by U.S. President Barack H. Obama on April 27, 2011 is a forensic forgery. In the interview, Mr. Stanley’s statement is accompanied by an on-camera demonstration of various forgeries within the nine overlaid digital layers of the birth certificate document as released on the White House website.
Earlier on April 29, 2011, Mr. Stanley reported the breaking news regarding the forensic fraud in Mr. Obama’s newly released birth certificate on Washington Times investigative radio.
While being interviewed by reporters, Mr. Stanley indicated that the White House has in fact taken down Mr. Obama’s alleged recently released birth certificate from the White House website overnight here), although the White House has left a copy of the alleged birth certificate of Mr. Obama.
– here – .
As of this writing, Mr. Stanley stated there had been no overt comment from the White House other than the taking of the birth certificate offline. Neither officials of the Hawaii state birth registrar nor of the Honolulu hospital where Mr. Obama allegedly was born have, as yet, commented.
Mr. Stanley stated that the headquarters of Donald Trump had put him in touch directly with Mr. Trump, and that he had forwarded the evidence of forensic forgery in Mr. Obama’s birth certificate directly to Mr. Trump.
Donald Trump, a possible contender for the 2012 Republican nomination for U.S. President, stated on April 27, 2011 that he considers himself instrumental in forcing Mr. Obama to release the alleged birth certificate, and now apparent forensic fraud.
View Interview with Robert Stanley on forensic fraud on Obama birth certificate
Readers can view the interview of Robert Stanley by Alfred Lambremont Webre on forensic fraud and the Obama birth certificate in the video embedded in the article above or at the following URL:
Mr. Stanley graphically demonstrates using copies of various of the nine overlaid digital layers within the forensically fraudulent birth certificate of Mr. Obama that the birth certificate was assembled as a forged document, using components of many other documents.
Robert Stanley’s conclusions congruent with other independent research on forensic fraud in Obama birth certificate
Robert M. Stanley’s conclusions are also congruent with other independent analyses of Mr. Obama’s alleged birth certificate released April 27, 2011, including the following:
Barack Obama’s Birth Certificate is a Digitally Layered Photoshop Fake
Proof Obama’s 4/27/11 “Long Form Certificate of Birth” is Forged!
Obama Birth Certificate Scam? 2011-04-27 Obama
Other anomalies in the forensically forged Obama birth certificate
Researchers have identified a number of anomalies on the alleged birth certificate of Mr. Obama, apart from the evidence of forensic forgery provided by analysis of its nine layers.
One researcher states, “Look at the hospital name on this document [Mr. Obama's alleged birth certificate]. The hospital had a different name in 1961, it was not named Kapiolani Maternity and Gynocological Hospital, it was called Kaokiolani Children’s Hospital. It did not get the Kapiolani name until the mid-1970s when they merged. Kenya was not called “Kenya” in 1961 it was called “The British East Africa Protectorate” at the time Obama was born and this document was supposedly printed. Then in 1963 it became “The Dominion of Kenya.” Then later on became the “Republic of Kenya.”
Another researcher states, “I’m not going to say that the information on the document is bogus, but I can definitely, without hesitation, say that the document was originally a two-layer piece. The top layer is the ‘black’ part that came from a scanner as a grayscale scan. It was converted to black and white and the white part was made transparent.
“That was dropped onto a generic green watermark background, which is what makes it look official. But that was NOT on the original document as scanned. This is very evident by the white haloing around everything black. It is also extremely evident that a layer was dropped onto the green background because the green marks are very crisp in the areas around the edges of the image, but are very blurred where the black image block covers it.
“Now keep in mind that before the green background was added, the original scan could have easily been altered, dates or names changed. I’m not saying it was. I’m just saying it’s a 100% fact that it could have been. So, this document as we see it is still not proof of anything. I could easily recreate this document with someone else’s original Hawaii birth certificate and a generic watermark background.”
Another researcher writes, “Jerome Corsi writes that the issue represents the ‘Rosetta Stone’ of deciphering both Obama’s previously released short-form Certification of Live Birth and the newly released purported copy of his long-form birth certificate.”
“It centers around the fact that two twins born in the same Kapi’olani hospital listed on the Obama document the day after Obama was purportedly born actually have birth certificate numbers lower than Obama. The number should be lower on the Obama certificate if he was born before the twins.
“As Corsi explains, ‘Susan Nordyke, the first twin, was born at 2:12 p.m. Hawaii time Aug. 5, 1961, and was given certificate No. 151 – 61 – 10637, which was filed with the Hawaii registrar Aug. 11, 1961.
“Gretchen Nordyke, the second twin, was born at 2:17 p.m. Hawaii time Aug. 5, 1961, and was given certificate No. 151 – 61 – 10638, which was also filed with the Hawaii registrar Aug. 11, 1961.”
“Yet, according to the Certification of Live Birth displayed by FactCheck.org during the 2008 presidential campaign – and now according to the long-form birth certificate the White House released today – Barack Obama was given a higher certificate number than the Nordykes.”
“Note, Obama was given certificate No. 151 – 1961 – 10641, even though he was born Aug. 4, 1961, the day before the Nordyke twins, and his birth was registered with the Hawaii Department of Health registrar three days earlier, Aug. 8, 1961.”
Continue reading on Examiner.com: